Files
Detecting Malicious Files: A Comprehensive Approach
Malicious files serve as a cornerstone of many cyberattacks, providing attackers with tools for persistence, data exfiltration, or remote control. Identifying these files is critical in incident response. Below, we explore both manual and automatic detection methods.
1. Manual Detection
Manual analysis focuses on investigating suspicious files based on specific timeframes, file attributes, and unusual behaviors.
Steps for Manual Detection:
A. Determine the Timeframe
Identify the time window when the suspicious activity occurred.
Use this to focus on files created or modified during that period.
Command-Line Approach:
B. Search for Suspicious Files
File Explorer:
Open File Explorer.
Navigate to suspected directories (e.g.,
C:\Users\Public
,C:\Windows\Temp
).Use the Search tab to filter files by Date Modified.
C. Focus on Common Malicious Extensions
Look for files with extensions often used for executables or scripts:
.exe
(executable files).bat
(batch scripts).cmd
(command scripts).vbs
(Visual Basic scripts).ps1
(PowerShell scripts).dll
(dynamic link libraries)
Example PowerShell Command:
Advantages of Manual Methods
Targeted Review: Human oversight can spot suspicious patterns or files in unexpected locations.
Bypass Detection: Can identify malware that has evaded automated scanners through obfuscation or novel behaviors.
Challenges
Time-Consuming: Reviewing files manually requires significant time, especially on systems with large file volumes.
Requires Expertise: Relies on the analyst’s ability to recognize malicious patterns or anomalies.
2. Automatic Detection
Automated tools leverage predefined signatures, heuristics, and behavioral analysis to detect malicious files efficiently.
Steps for Automatic Detection:
A. Run a Full Disk Scan
Use antivirus or specialized malware scanners:
Antivirus Tools:
Microsoft Defender
Symantec
McAfee
Specialized Malware Scanners:
Malwarebytes
ESET Online Scanner
Sophos Clean
B. Review Scan Results
After the scan:
Investigate flagged files.
Pay attention to quarantined or potentially unwanted programs (PUPs).
C. Behavior-Based Detection
Some tools (e.g., CrowdStrike, Cylance) use behavioral analysis to detect malware by observing anomalous actions.
Limitations of Automatic Methods
Evasion Techniques: Advanced malware often uses obfuscation or encryption to bypass traditional AV detection.
False Negatives: Customized or zero-day malware may not match known signatures.
Supplemental Analysis
Combining manual and automatic detection methods enhances detection accuracy.
Hybrid Workflow:
Run an Automated Scan: Use AV tools for a preliminary sweep.
Manual Review:
Focus on time-correlated files missed by automated tools.
Investigate unknown or unsigned executables flagged by AV.
Key Takeaways
Method | Use Case | Strengths | Limitations |
Manual | Focused on known timeframes and custom analysis | Effective for novel or customized malware | Time-intensive, expertise-dependent |
Automatic | Broad file scanning using AV or malware scanners | Fast and efficient for known threats | Vulnerable to evasion techniques |
Combining both methods provides a comprehensive approach to detect and analyze malicious files, ensuring a robust incident response.
Last updated